What it means
GTMAPIs exposes valid_role_based as a first-class status. It is not hidden inside valid because teams need to distinguish personal contacts from inboxes such as sales, info, support, or admin aliases.
Email validation semantics
A valid_role_based result means the mailbox can be accepted while still being a low-value team or function address for outbound targeting.
Canonical status
valid_role_based
Status language is backed by the shared validation result contract and product publish gates.
GTMAPIs exposes valid_role_based as a first-class status. It is not hidden inside valid because teams need to distinguish personal contacts from inboxes such as sales, info, support, or admin aliases.
Outbound systems should keep role-based results visible for reporting, but should usually avoid treating them as personal send-ready leads.
valid_role_based is one of the five canonical statuses in the public validation contract and passes through normalization unchanged. It is never classified as high-value, and validation summaries count it in its own bucket instead of folding it into valid.
Role-based inboxes such as sales, info, support, or admin are usually shared. Route them by campaign intent rather than deleting them.
No. It is a canonical public status with lower outbound quality than a high-value personal valid result.
Credits are consumed only for chargeable high-value validations. valid_role_based is never high-value, so it follows the non-chargeable path under the credit policy.
Not necessarily. They are deliverable inboxes and can fit operational or account-level outreach. Suppress them from personal sequences and keep them visible in reporting.